Find Your Options for SEO Now

In this overview you will find the latest contributions; sorted descending by date. The tips are divided into different “chapters”. To display tips for a single chapter, select the desired entry from the chapter overview in the navigation on the right.

This collection of tips is constantly being expanded and updated. So far, a total of 72 tips have appeared, more followed at irregular intervals.We wish you every success in optimizing your website and are happy to receive any comment on the previous posts or suggestions on the content.

rel = “next / prev” for multi-page content

For some time, Google has been pleased to be metadata-aware when a page is part of a series of pages. This is undoubtedly at least practical for longer articles that are divided into several pages, series of articles in a blog … Above all, but in large categories in a shop whose articles do not fit on one page, these references are useful to install. The right SEO Company offers you the right support.

Easy installation?

The use is – theoretically – very simple and requires references to previous and following pages in the headers of the page source text. Here is an example of a second page of a coherent series of at least 3 pages:

Yahoo Site Explorer Successor Wanted: Free Backlink Checker Overview

The Yahoo Site Explorer is history. This means that many tools for analyzing incoming links that were previously offered free of charge and based on the Yahoo data are also no longer usable (if they ever existed before). But since numerous providers have been working on potential successors for some time already, there are already some backlink checkers that can be used free of charge as a new point of contact for anyone who still wants to provide information about the link profile of their own website or their competitors as free of charge as possible.

This paper presents some of these (new or established) potential YSE successors and compares the results quantitativelybased on three examples of selected domains of different “size” and orientation (rather small blog, “normal” corporate site, well-linked online tool). For comparison, the number of found links and different domains is considered to be the (almost) lowest common denominator. Some tools also show the IP popularity or the number of hosts vs. Number of domains, but the comparison should be limited to these two measures only.

Optimize metadata for social media links?

Facebook and Google+ offer various ways to control the appearance of a page when a link is to be published. Facebook relies on its own “Open-Graph-Tags”; Google prefers to use microformats according to schema.org . But is it even necessary to deal with it and where is the advantage? Do you need both formats? With a simple page you can see the respective effects on links on Facebook and Google+.

Comments are closed.